Ubi dubium ibi libertas. [entries|friends|calendar]
my userpic
<------- Greg

[ website | Step Inside - Redux ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ memories | memorable posts ]

BARCC walk [2010/02/03 (Wednesday) 11:39 EST]
I'm doing the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center's Walk for Change again this year. You can go to my fundraising page to either donate to me or to register for the walk yourself (by clicking the "I want to raise money too" link near the top of the page).
click here for a prize

Books of 2010 [2010/01/06 (Wednesday) 16:16 EST]
Happy New Year!

In keeping with previous years, here's what I'm reading in 2010.
(2007, 2008, and 2009)

1) Terry Pratchett: Carpet People (audio, finished 01-04) One of his few pre-Discworld books, it has apparently been described as "Lord of the Rings on a rug". Which is pretty apt.
2) Terry Pratchett: Strata (audio, finished 01-06) Another pre-Discworld novel set on a flat world (this one planet-sized and quite possibly the inspiration for Discworld itself). As SF rather than fantasy, this one is largely a parody of (and homage to) Niven's Ringworld. Since I'm a huge fan of both Pratchett and Niven (especially the Known Space collection of which Ringworld is a part), I enjoyed this one immensely.
3) Richard Dawkins: The God Delusion (text, finished 01-19) Very good, as I've found all the other Dawkins I've read, and undeserving of most of the religious criticism leveled at it, which as usual seems to come largely from people who missed the point entirely. Seemed to downplay physical and sexual abuse a bit to make the point that religion itself can be a kind of abuse to young children, though, which point I think he could have made much better without trivializing other forms of abuse with a few anecdotes (one his own) of people who were not themselves traumatized by them.
3 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Happy Boxing Day [2009/12/26 (Saturday) 12:21 EST]
Family and presents and everything are nice, but always a bit melancholy as well.


(First saw this picture at Pharyngula, where PZ Myers has a touching post dedicated to his father, who died 16 years ago today.)
click here for a prize

Rape Prevention Tips Guaranteed To Work! [2009/12/14 (Monday) 18:57 EST]
From iblamethepatriarchy, via skeptifem:

1. Don’t put drugs in women’s drinks.

2. When you see a woman walking by herself, leave her alone.

3. If you pull over to help a woman whose car has broken down, remember not to assault her.

4. If you are in a lift and a woman gets in, don’t assault her. You know what? Don’t even ogle her.

5. When you encounter a woman who is asleep, the safest course of action is to not assault her.

6. Never creep into a woman’s home through an unlocked door or window, or spring out at her from between parked cars.

7. When you lurk in bushes and doorways with criminal intentions, always wear bright clothing, wave a flashlight, or play “Boys Who Rape (Should All Be Destroyed)” by the Raveonettes on a boombox really loud, so women in the vicinity will know where to aim their flamethrowers.

8. USE THE BUDDY SYSTEM! If it is inconvenient for you to stop yourself from assaulting women, ask a trusted feminist friend to accompany you when in public.

9. Carry a rape whistle. If you find that you are about to assault a woman, you can hand the whistle to your buddy, so s/he can blow it to call for help.

10. Give your buddy a revolver, so that when indifferent passers-by ignore the rape whistle, s/he can pistol-whip you.

Don’t forget: Honesty is the best policy. When asking a woman out on a date, don’t pretend that you are interested in her as a person; tell her that you expect to be assaulting her later. If you don’t communicate your intentions, the woman may take that as a sign that you do not plan to rape her.




These are 100% guaranteed to work. Its a crazy new approach I have heard about, where people who are actually doing the assaulting are educated about not assaulting others, instead of only educating women to defend themselves.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Halloween party [2009/11/06 (Friday) 20:06 EST]
More photos are here.


I went as half me and half my evil twin (my sinister half, as it were...)

I'm rather proud of sewing the shirts and pants together successfully, but I'm not sure I'll ever find a reason to wear them again now.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced [2009/10/08 (Thursday) 18:57 EST]
Brilliant article someone recently brought up for discussion on the xkcd forum, so I thought I'd also link to it here.

When you approach me in public, you are Schrödinger’s Rapist. You may or may not be a man who would commit rape. I won’t know for sure unless you start sexually assaulting me. I can’t see inside your head, and I don’t know your intentions. If you expect me to trust you—to accept you at face value as a nice sort of guy—you are not only failing to respect my reasonable caution, you are being cavalier about my personal safety.
---
I'd like to think one could link to this article any time some guy gets pissy about how irrational women keep brushing him off when all he wants is some innocent chitchat, but unfortunately people on the forum have already proved it'll just go over their heads...
8 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Roman Polanski [2009/10/06 (Tuesday) 16:30 EST]
The list reproduced here is really disheartening. It includes people involved in the film industry who apparently think Roman Polanski's drugging and raping of a 13 year old is merely "a case of morals". To read the wording of the petition, it's as though they think his detention in Switzerland happened because The Man disagrees politically with some art he made. Rather than the reality, which is that he drugged and raped a 13 year old and then essentially fled the country after a plea bargain.

On the other hand, I was glad to read that this list of some of those who think rape should have consequences even if you are a fancy moving picture director includes far more people who I actually know and like. In addition to giving hope that not everyone is horrible, it means it won't be terribly difficult to boycott and otherwise ignore the idiots who signed the first petition.
2 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Political Science [2009/08/18 (Tuesday) 17:59 EST]
I was in a recent discussion where someone was lumped in with other WASPs as being the sort to always embrace the status quo when it comes to issues of privilege and discrimination and such. Turns out that guy is Native Canadian, and none of W, A-S, or P. It sort of got me to thinking about something I've heard mentioned from time to time on the SGU podcast: You shouldn't base your ethical views on falsifiable scientific claims unless you're planning to change those views in light of further evidence.

It's fine to say that sexist hiring practices are wrong because relevant skills can be assessed directly, and so using sex alone as a proxy for something else like physical strength or intelligence would serve only to reinforce the biases of whoever's doing the hiring. But if you say such hiring is wrong because there are no statistically significant differences between men and women for such-and-such characteristic, then you may have dug yourself into a hole. In general, we probably haven't done enough research into that characteristic for anyone to be able to say for sure, and so you've left yourself open to losing the entire basis of your argument should evidence arise that shows there is in fact a difference.

Relying too much on arguments like that also leads to lots of political objections to basic scientific research. Not ethical objections, mind you. Nothing wrong with saying that perhaps we should take more consideration for the well-being of test subjects and lab animals, for instance. I mean more along the lines of someone on the right objecting to research showing that, say, increased sexual activity in adolescence leads to healthier offspring later in life, or something like that. Or someone on the left objecting to research that shows objectively that newborn boys and girls, absent any social influences, really do differ on average in their levels of aggression or interest in mechanical things or whatever.

Early promiscuity is probably bad for a number of other reasons which outweigh healthy offspring later, and rigidly prescribed gender roles probably cause plenty of serious problems that outweigh any slight benefit of encouraging a small inborn natural tendency. So it should be the promiscuity and prescriptive gender roles themselves that are objected to. Not the research or the researchers involved in discovering more information about the human condition.
click here for a prize

Update [2009/07/14 (Tuesday) 23:03 EST]
Oh, and hey all. Things are going well.

Saw the fireworks again on the 4th with some friends and some of my students, and enjoyed that long weekend which was also the first nice weather we'd had in ages. Then on the 6th we started four weeks of summer schedule at GEOS, which means I don't have to start until 12:30, which has been nice for sleeping in this month, and for staying at a friend's bday party until 3am last Tuesday without worrying that I'd be completely dead at work the following day.

This weekend I went to Newburyport on Saturday for a music festival, and then to Plum Island that night for a small beach fire that ended up getting rained out. Sunday my friend Rebecca came down from NH and we went to see the Tall Ships on their last day in Boston. It worked out well, since she probably wouldn't have bothered driving all the way down just to see them by herself, and I wouldn't have bothered going the single train stop (and shuttle bus ride) from my house to get there if I'd been going alone.

Tonight I did trivia again in Malden with some friends, and our team came in second, which finally qualifies us for the tournament round in another month or so (we've been getting progressively better, but still usually missed the top places by 10 or more points). Could've gotten first if we'd gone with our guts on the last answer, though, instead of chickening out and taking 0 points for no answer instead of risking -5 for a wrong one.

Recently re-signed the lease for this place, which is a nice feeling, since it's the first lease I've signed again since 2004, and is already the place I've lived in longest since leaving my apartment in Ann Arbor. Still have a bit of a travel bug, though. There was some talk among my friends of Morocco in 2010, and I'd kinda like to go to Mexico for their bicentennial in 14 months. But I'd need to save up money for either or both trips to be possible, which isn't something I'm doing very successfully at the moment.

My dad's getting married on the 24th, so I'm going back to Michigan for that, and I invited Melissa, since Heather can't get the time off work and it'd be too short notice for anyone else from Boston. Not that anyone else here would be a better person to invite than her, since she does know my family quite well and was there for me after my mom died and a few times during the following Christmas season and such. While I love my friends here of course, there's definitely something to be said for people I've known and been close to for a decent chunk of my life, rather than just for the past 18 months or so.
click here for a prize

Damn racist nonsense [2009/07/14 (Tuesday) 22:54 EST]
Republican senators sparred with Judge Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday over racial bias, judicial activism and temperament as she presented herself as a reliable follower of precedent rather than a jurist shaped by gender and ethnicity, as some of her past speeches suggested.

I'm really damn angry that she needs to say anything of the kind. Are we to believe that those same Republican senators haven't let every decision they've ever made be influenced by the fact that they are largely a group of privileged straight, white, wealthy, Christian, cisgendered men?

It's fine if their privilege shows through every word they say, but they'll turn around and get pissy as all hell if she ever writes a single judicial opinion that's colored by the fact that she actually might know what the hell she's talking about in a case involving racial minorities or women.

She has to assure him that her "identity wouldn't distort decisions"? The fuck is that?

Kind of like the conservative Protestants who were up in arms about Kennedy being Catholic, as if they hadn't let their own Protestant religious beliefs color the history of American politics from approximately the very beginning.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

"Another post about rape", from Fugitivus [2009/07/02 (Thursday) 17:19 EST]
Sophy posted a link to this, which I think everyone should read.

If women are raised being told by parents, teachers, media, peers, and all surrounding social strata that:

* it is not okay to set solid and distinct boundaries and reinforce them immediately and dramatically when crossed (”mean bitch”)
* it is not okay to appear distraught or emotional (”crazy bitch”)
* it is not okay to make personal decisions that the adults or other peers in your life do not agree with, and it is not okay to refuse to explain those decisions to others (”stuck-up bitch”)
* it is not okay to refuse to agree with somebody, over and over and over again (”angry bitch”)
* it is not okay to have (or express) conflicted, fluid, or experimental feelings about yourself, your body, your sexuality, your desires, and your needs (”bitch got daddy issues”)
* it is not okay to use your physical strength (if you have it) to set physical boundaries (”dyke bitch”)
* it is not okay to raise your voice (”shrill bitch”)
* it is not okay to completely and utterly shut down somebody who obviously likes you (”mean dyke/frigid bitch”)

If we teach women that there are only certain ways they may acceptably behave, we should not be surprised when they behave in those ways.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Recent twitter updates [2009/06/29 (Monday) 13:02 EST]
Some things I told Twitter that I probably didn't update LJ about:

  • 13:25 Since I was already angry at them, I choose to blame US Airways for Billy Mays's death. #
  • 17:27 There's nothing wrong with personally mourning a celebrity (even (alleged) child molesters...) I'm mostly annoyed by the news saturation. #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter
click here for a prize

Something Sophy wrote about George Tiller [2009/06/02 (Tuesday) 23:52 EST]
I wanted to go to the vigil for Dr. Tiller, but fucked up on the time and missed it. So here's what a friend of mine wrote after going:

One of the women there had had one a few years back when she was living in Texas. By the time she could get an appointment she would have been in her 12th week, so he would not do it. She had no one to turn to and she could turn to Dr. Tiller. And he treated her well enough to help make up for the anti-abortion people who harassed her.
Another woman found out in the third trimester her son had abnormalities that meant he would never survive. Then her OBGYN told her he could not do it. She traveled 10 hours to see Dr. Tiller. He let her hold her son, baptize him, take prints of his hands and feet, and say goodbye to him. She was also harassed by anti-abortion terrorists.

Then there was a woman how had her first abortion in 1972, before abortion was legal. It had been the first time she had sex. She had to wait on a street corner at night. Get into a car with 4 large men. Drive with them while blindfolded. Eventually get out and go the the third floor of a building where she was given basically a bent coat hanger and some antibiotics. She had a fever of over 103 for a week, and had to have her nurse roommate get her more antibiotics from her work. When she went to a doctor 6 months later he shamed her and harassed her without telling her if she could ever have children.
I want to make sure no one has to go through that. It still happens in places were abortion is illegal or where doctors are unavailable due to time, space, and money.

He did important work. Work I am not sure anyone else really does (women from NY and MA have been sent to him in Kansas as well). He did it with respect to women.

He actually trusted women (and believed them for once when they said what they needed) and someone killed him for it. I would be willing to die if I could really help people like he did.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Happy Memorial Day! [2009/05/25 (Monday) 15:57 EST]
Hope you're all enjoying the remembrance of our dead soldiers by having barbecues and buying shit on sale!

Things are good here. Pretty lazy weekend that I've mostly occupied so far by watching my roommate's DVDs of Veronica Mars. (Just figured I should leave *some* kind of update since it's been like a month since my last post.)
click here for a prize

"I'm yours" [2009/04/29 (Wednesday) 22:00 EST]
So, how would you explain or simplify the meaning of this expression (in the romantic sense) for someone learning English, *without* bringing up (and then trying to somehow also explain) all the complicated baggage of love-as-possession and such? Because in addition to that being extra difficult to explain on top of it, it's probably not literally in anyone's mind when they use the phrase, anyway. (At least, I would hope that the student in question didn't hear that from someone who meant it with the same depth one might impart in their marriage vows or something. After all, there's clearly still a language barrier to work through first.)

Also, I don't want to creep the student out by interpreting as an expression of deep undying love, something that might have just been innocent flirtation from someone else who also lacks a complete grasp of the language...
2 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Well that's concerning as hell [2009/04/26 (Sunday) 09:01 EST]
Tests show that eight students at a Queens high school are likely to have contracted the human swine flu virus that has struck Mexico and a small number of other people in the United States, health officials in New York City said yesterday.
---
In less concerning news, I've once again registered for the 20-mile Walk for Hunger this year. Feel free to donate to that if you'd like. Twenty miles may seem like a lot, but I watched people finishing the Boston Marathon last Monday, which made it seem a lot less impressive than it felt last year...
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Walk for Change [2009/03/22 (Sunday) 03:12 EST]
So I registered awhile ago for the BARCC walk happening in two weeks, and kept forgetting to mention it here in hopes of possibly getting some other donations from people. My own sponsorship page is here, if anyone wants to donate.

My best friend's mom actually helped start BARCC back in the 1970s, but while it's great that it's continued helping survivors since then, it remains the *only* provider of comprehensive rape crisis services in the greater Boston area. Anything you can give to help them continue doing what they do would be awesome. (And if you're in the Boston area and want to walk with us, that'd be excellent, too.)
2 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Oops, suppose an update would be in order [2009/03/21 (Saturday) 11:52 EST]
Watched the BSG finale last night with folks. It's kinda sad now the whole thing's over, both in terms of no longer being with those characters we've seen through so much, and in terms of no longer getting together with people to watch it. I first got interested in it when I was in Berkeley on my way back from Oz, in early 2006. And while the finale was kind of disappointing, in retrospect it does compare favorably to quite a few other series endings I've seen for other shows, which either ended way prematurely or got driven into the ground by continuing several years longer than necessary.

In other news, things are going well. I'm enjoying the nicening weather, though I'm worried about how to get an AC unit into my casement window, which will at some point be a necessity given how much the sun heats up my room in the morning. My dad and Candice may be visiting in April, during their spring break, which should be cool. Also visiting in April is our (Internet) friend Jesse, from England.

On the job front, I still definitely enjoy teaching, though I'm thinking now that it most likely won't be a long-term career for me. So probably at some point in the vague future (when the economy gets better and there are actually other jobs to be had, perhaps?) I'll start thinking about what else I might like to do.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Yay cheap! [2009/02/15 (Sunday) 12:28 EST]
Happy Discount Chocolate Day, everyone!
click here for a prize

On saving *our* environment [2009/02/06 (Friday) 09:52 EST]
I like wordsmith.org's word of the day emails, because they come with a "thought for the day" quote, which is usually quite edifying.

Myth: we have to save the earth. Frankly, the earth doesn't need to be saved. Nature doesn't give a hoot if human beings are here or not. The planet has survived cataclysmic and catastrophic changes for millions upon millions of years. Over that time, it is widely believed, 99 percent of all species have come and gone while the planet has remained. Saving the environment is really about saving our environment - making it safe for ourselves, our children, and the world as we know it. If more people saw the issue as one of saving themselves, we would probably see increased motivation and commitment to actually do so.
-Robert M. Lilienfeld, management consultant and author (b. 1953) and William L. Rathje, archaeologist and author (b. 1945)
click here for a prize

Fuck Twenty-Five [2009/01/30 (Friday) 20:20 EST]
Because I'm about to say goodbye to being 25 years old, so it seems appropriate to feign something against the number itself, right? (Also, I am totally not participating in the viral Facebook meme everyone else is doing. And don't you forget it.)

So what I'm going to do is share a number of random facts about myself, and then tag another number of people on Facebook. A different number, mind you, and one *much* closer to being negative than the number of facts.

1) I was born at 4:16pm, and use this fact to remember that the first Moon landing occurred at 4:17pm (though that was Daylight time, while my birth wasn't, as it was in winter).

2) I have seen Ani DiFranco live five times. Six if you count seeing her warm up before 2004's March for Women's Lives in DC, but I didn't actually see her play her concert on that occasion.

3) This is more than I've seen any other artist.

4) In tenth grade, I computed how much antimatter would have to be evenly distributed throughout the Great Lakes to completely vaporize them all. (No, I don't still remember. It was rather a lot, though. It takes a lot of energy to heat and then boil water.)

5) Adding to the nerdcount, the following year I was in a Quiz Bowl match that our team won because my friend Carolyn remembered the capital of Bulgaria before the other team. This scene in my memory has ever since been how I know it's Sofia.

6) I live in an apartment now with five other people. We sometimes finish each other's sentences and thus call our house the Hive.

7) We buzz at each other sometimes on the Internet.

8) The first pro-choice event I ever went to was held at my church, on the 25th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. I went with my dad. (That was also the first time I remember hearing anything about Ani DiFranco, because there was a silent auction and one of the items a friend of ours won was an autographed poster of her.)

9) The only famous person whose autograph I ever got was David Copperfield. I have no idea whatsoever what happened to that.

10) My education/career plans evolved as follows: a) when I first started thinking about it, I was definitely going to college out of state. b) the University of Michigan offered me money and I had no idea what I wanted to study so I figured it was stupid to spend tens of thousands of dollars on that, so I went there. c) I was definitely going to major in physics and philosophy. d) physics classes were at inconvenient (read: early) times, so I switched to math. e) I definitely wasn't interested in law school, despite my mom's insistence that I'd probably be good at it. f) I took a class on women and the law and thought maybe law school would be a good idea, so I took the LSAT. g) while living in New Mexico with my aunt and uncle, intending to work for a bit to move to CA for law school, I decided to go to Mexico and teach English for awhile. h) After returning from Mexico, I decided I liked Boston, largely because I had friends there who I met on the Internet, so I moved here.

11) I'm starting to get bored of this entry.

12) Twelve is a nice number, and I'm going to go over to Heather's for Battlestar soon, so here's where I stop.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Pros and Cons of Swearing [2009/01/26 (Monday) 17:13 EST]
So I'm currently reading Steven Pinker's The Stuff of Thought (which is fan-fucking-tastic and I highly recommend it to all y'all), and he's got a chapter on the linguistics of swearing. There's a lot of fascinating stuff about the etymology and neurophysiology and pragmatics of swearing, which I may talk about when I feel like writing a more boring entry that fewer of you care about at all. For now, I'd just like to quote a bit that I think is quite good about the actual costs and benefits of swearing. I particularly like his bringing up that words can truly hurt because we can't help understanding them, and so they can force listeners to think about certain things whether they want to or not (the bolded part is my own added emphasis, since I think it does a good job of explaining, on an emotional level rather than a political one, why even good liberals find certain exercises of speech objectionable):
Language has often been called a weapon, and people should be mindful about where to aim it and when to fire. The common denominator of taboo words is the act of forcing a disagreeable thought on someone, and it's worth considering how often one really wants one's audience to be reminded of excrement, urine, and exploitative sex. Even in its mildest form, intended only to keep the listener's attention, the lazy use of profanity can feel like a series of jabs in the ribs. They are annoying to the listener, and a confession by the speaker that he can think of no other way to make his words worth attending to. It's all the more damning for writers, who have the luxury of choosing their words off-line from the half-million-word phantasmagoria of the English lexicon. A journalist who, in writing about the cruelty of an East German Stasi guard, can do no better than to call him a fucker needs to get a good thesaurus.

Also calling for reflection is whether a linguistic taboo is alwyas a bad thing. Why are we offended--why should we be offended--when an outsider refers to an African American as a nigger, or a woman as a cunt, or a Jewish person as a fucking Jew? The terms have no real meaning, so the offense cannot come from their perpetuating a stereotype or endorsing oppression. Nor is it a reaction to learning that the speaker harbors an abominable attitude. These days someone who displayed the same attitude by simply saying "I hate African Americans, women, and Jews" would be stigmatizing himself far more than his targets, and would quickly be written of as a loathsome kook. I suspect that our sense of offense comes from the nature of speech recognition and from what it means to understand the connotation of a word. If you're an English speaker, you can't hear the words nigger or cunt or fucking without calling to mind what they mean to an implicit community of speakers, including the emotions that cling to them. To hear nigger is to try on, however briefly, the thought that there is something contemptible about African Americans, and thus to be complicit in a community that standardized that judgment by putting it into a word. The same thing happens with other taboo imprecations: just hearing the words feels morally corrosive, so we consider them not just unpleasant to think but not to be thought at all--that is, taboo. None of this means that the words should be banned, only that their effects on listeners should be understood and anticipated.
...
Those are some of the reasons to think twice about giving carte blanche to swearing. But there is another reason. If an overuse of taboo words, whether by design or laziness, blunts their emotional edge, it will have deprived us of a linguistic instrument that we sometimes sorely need. And this brings me to the arguments on the pro-swearing side.

To begin with, it's a fact of life that people swear. The responsibility of writers is to give a "just and lively image of human nature," and that includes portraying a character's language realistically when their art calls for it. When Norman Mailer wrote his true-to-life novel about World War II, The Naked and the Dead, in 1948, he knew it would be a betrayal of his depiction of the soldiers to have them speak without swearing. His compromise with the sensibilities of the day was to have them use the pseudo-epithet fug. (When Dorothy Parker met him she said, "So you're the man who doesn't know how to spell fuck.") Sadly, this prissiness is not a thing of the past. Some public television stations today are afraid to broadcast Martin Scorsese's documentary on the history of the blues and Ken Burns's documentary on World War II because of the salty language in their interviews with musicians and soldiers. The prohibition against swearing in broadcast media makes artists and historians into liars, and subverts the responsibility of grown-ups to learn how life is lived in worlds distant from their own.
...
When used judiciously, swearing can be hilarious, poignant, and uncannily descriptive. More than any other form of language, it recruits our evocativeness of metaphor; the pleasure of alliteration, meter, and rhyme; and the emotional charge of our attitudes, both thinkable and unthinkable. It engages the full expanse of the brain: left and right, high and low, ancient and modern. Shakespeare, no stranger to earthy imprecations himself, had Caliban speak for the entire human race when he said, "You taught me language, and my profit on't is, I know how to curse."
click here for a prize

Books of 2009 [2009/01/18 (Sunday) 00:04 EST]
In keeping with last year and the year before, this will be a regularly updated list of the books I read this year. It's been awhile since the last one I finished (December 8), because I'd started three before finishing any one of them. But I got a lot of good ones for Christmas, so hopefully I'll get some good reading done.

Print
1) Alan Moore: Watchmen (finished 2009-01-17) Very, very good. Deals with some interesting themes I toyed with a bit in Mexico when I made some short-lived efforts to write stories. In particular, the fact that a true super"hero" (i.e. person with superpowers who wanted to do good things) would likely become pretty dehumanized, because he or she would place big picture concerns above individual people. And as much as it might intellectually make sense to kill, say, a couple million innocent people to save a couple billion, most of us would be completely unwilling to actually go through with something like that, and would see as pretty horrific anyone who did.
2) Steven Pinker: The Stuff of Thought (finished 02-08) I already wrote an entry about this book, which was excellent. There were, however, a few unquestioned conventions (and untrue conventional beliefs) he had about gender and sexuality, which bothered me even more than the couple incorrect etymological stories he gave for words, which a few seconds with the OED were sufficient to contradict.
3) Simon Singh: Fermat's Enigma (finished 02-25) Like his Code Book, this was well-written, accessible by the layperson and at the same time not dumbed down too much. Sure, he doesn't get into the real hardcore mathematics of it, but it's not a graduate-level textbook, after all.
4) Steven Pinker: Words and Rules (finished 03-19) More analytic and dense than Stuff of Thought, but also without some of the annoying problems of that book. If you are interested in how the mind works, particularly with respect to language, it's definitely something I recommend reading at some point.
5) Phil Plait: Death from the Skies! (finished 05-31; in the intervening time I also caught up on about a year and a half's worth of the SGU podcast) Excellent book, which I highly recommend. It's a very humorous and readable account of all the ways the cosmos can kill us.
6) Mike Mignola and John Byrne: Hellboy: Seed of Destruction (finished 06-22) Read this one afternoon on a day off from work. Pretty quick read, but interesting, and my roommate has quite a bit of the series if not all of it, so I'll probably continue at some point.
7) Mike Mignola: Hellboy: Wake the Devil (finished something like 06-30)
8) Terry Pratchett: Soul Music (finished 08-23) Read this one instead of listening, because the audio book had big chunks missing.
9) Steven Pinker: The Language Instinct (finished 09-14) Also excellent, but subject to a couple minor examples of problems I also had with Stuff of Thought. It took me such a long time to finish this one (which I think I started shortly after finishing Phil Plait's), because, as you can see, I proceeded to get distracted by nearly 20 audiobooks...
10) Terry Pratchett: The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents (finished 10-11) Some glitchiness in this audiobook as well, so I read it the old fashioned way.
11) Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon: Preacher (finished the 9-volume series on 12-10) Really good and a bit fucked up. This is another series that Jordan has in its entirety, so I figured I'd check it out.
12) Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra: Y: The Last Man (finished 10 volumes 10-12) Also rather excellent. I have always been a fan of the post-apocalypse genre, so of course I liked that aspect of it, but the character development and social commentary and such were also good.
13) Warren Ellis and Darick Robertson: Transmetropolitan (finished the series about 12-17) Yet another series of graphic novels. The artwork in this is a lot denser, which makes it interesting because you can look at the main subject of a panel and just read the dialogue straight through, or take a much longer time to actually notice all the little things going on in the background.

Audio
1) J. K. Rowling: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (finished 06-13) As good as the book, seeing as they're the same. I liked the audio versions I listened to in Mexico, so after catching up on SGU podcasts (as well as one on the history of the Byzantine Empire), I decided this should be the first audio book I downloaded.
2) Terry Pratchett: Wyrd Sisters (finished 06-18) Good, like other Discworld novels. Unfortunately there were bits missing from the audio version, which didn't include big chunks of plot, but did include presumably humorous dialogue. Plus the sudden shifts were rather jarring, even if I didn't miss much of great importance.
3) Terry Pratchett: Pyramids (finished 06-23) I actually read a bit of this one, because once again there was a part missing, but at least Meaux had the paper version.
4) Terry Pratchett: Guards! Guards! (finished 06-27) This one didn't even have missing bits, which was nice.
5) Terry Pratchett: Eric (finished around 06-30)
6) Robert A. Heinlein: Starship Troopers (finished 07-09) Typical Heinlein, in that the fictional society is an odd mix of some progressive elements and 1950s sensibilities. This one also includes the oft-criticized militaristic social structure, though I don't think that's any worse than a number of other futuristic scenarios. Heinlein himself does seem more in favor of it than other authors are of their fictional governments, however.
7) Terry Pratchett: Moving Pictures (finished 07-10) Probably don't need to say Pratchett is good every book I finish...
8) Terry Pratchett: Reaper Man (finished 07-16)
9) Terry Pratchett: Witches Abroad (finished 07-21)
The audio book I have for Small Gods is abridged, which I don't like, so I decided to skip it until I can read the whole thing.
10) Terry Pratchett: Lords and Ladies (finished 08-05 or so)
11) Terry Pratchett: Men at Arms (finished 08-10)
12) Terry Pratchett: Interesting Times (finished 08-15)
13) Terry Pratchett: Maskerade (finished 08-18 or 19)
14) Terry Pratchett: Feet of Clay (finished 08-22 maybe?)
15) Terry Pratchett: The Hogfather (finished 08-31)
16) Terry Pratchett: Jingo (finished 09-04)
17) Terry Pratchett: The Lost Continent (finished 09-10) I suspect much of this wouldn't have made sense if I hadn't been to Australia before. But since I have, it's possibly one of the funniest one I've listened to lately.
18) Terry Pratchett: Carpe Jugulum (finished 09-16) I'm pretty sure the witches are my favorite set of characters of the whole series, with the possible exception of a few members of the Watch. Granny Weatherwax and Vimes in particular are prone to the sort of introspection that proves Pratchett is really thinking about some deep things, in addition to superficially making fun of just about every trope found in fantasy universes.
19) Terry Pratchett: The Fifth Elephant (finished 09-22)
20) Terry Pratchett: The Truth (finished 09-28)
21) Terry Pratchett: The Last Hero (finished 10-06)
22) Terry Pratchett: Night Watch (finished 10-16)
23) Terry Pratchett: The Wee Free Men (finished 10-20) Listened to this one again in order, and some parts make a lot more sense now. (I did once before in 2007 before knowing anything at all of Discworld.)
24) Terry Pratchett: Monstrous Regiment (finished 10-23)
25) Terry Pratchett: A Hat Full of Sky (finished 10-27)
26) Terry Pratchett: Going Postal (finished 11-05)
27) Terry Pratchett: Thud! (finished 11-12)
28) Terry Pratchett: Wintersmith (finished 11-18)
29) Terry Pratchett: Making Money (finished 11-23 or 24) Odd to be done with the Discworld audiobooks now...
30) Terry Pratchett: Truckers (finished 12-18) This is the first of the Bromeliad trilogy, which is quite excellent and actually set on modern-day Earth.
31) Terry Pratchett: Diggers (finished 12-21)
32) Terry Pratchett: Wings (finished 12-30) Last book of the year, I think.
click here for a prize

Tattoo? [2009/01/15 (Thursday) 17:35 EST]
Poll #1331862 So I'm seriously considering getting a tattoo now.
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 10

Which Carl Sagan quote should I get?

View Answers

We are star stuff which has taken its destiny into its own hands.
6 (60.0%)

Look death in the eye and be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.
4 (40.0%)



Though my sister and my friend Heather and others already have text tattoos, it didn't really occur to me to think of words I'd want on my own body (as opposed to a picture or symbol) until Heather specifically suggested it the other day. At that point, I immediately thought of the first choice above, as well as some part of the extended quote the second one comes from. (I think I posted it on the anniversary of my mom's death, as well...):

The world is so exquisite with so much love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far better it seems to me, in our vulnerability, is to look death in the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent opportunity that life provides.

The entirety of that would be a bit much for a tattoo (especially a first tattoo), but I think I sort of captured the idea in the part I chose. Maybe like to include "vulnerability" as well if there's a way to do that without making it obvious that half the quote is missing...
4 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Oh right, I have an LJ, don't I? [2009/01/08 (Thursday) 10:21 EST]
Yeah, so I know I've been pretty lax in updating this.

Went to MI for Christmas, which was fun, but also weird because it wasn't at any place I consider "home". (My dad and Candice moved to Grand Rapids almost a year ago, and my dad finally sold the house in Allegan just this December.) It was pretty sad to put up my family's Christmas ornaments on a small, fake tree in the basement of a new condo...

I got good gifts, of books and movies and music, which is the only thing I ever ask for these days, what with pretty much buying other things I need. I did get some nice clothes from my sister, though. My dad was also disappointed that we'd stopped doing regular Cake Nights, because one of my stocking stuffers was a cake decorating set. Conferring with my roommates, though, we jointly realized that there's no reason Cake still has to be done on Sunday night (which is part of why we weren't ever interested in having so many people at our place until late-ish), simply because it had been Sundays when it was at Alex's house from January to August. Also, of course, we can make and decorate cake and invite some friends over without having to do a real, honest-to-goodness everyone's-invited Cake Night. So I'm sure they'll get some use.

Actually, that may happen this weekend, because an xkcd forumite from Russia is staying with us for a few days and it's his birthday soon.

On the job front (which I'm thinking of because I'm currently at work waiting for class to start), I quit my job in Malden in the evenings, because it basically felt like I had no real free time for myself during the week. And conveniently there's now a full-time position here (at GEOS) that opened up when one of the full-time teachers got promoted to academic coordinator. It's not certain I'll get that, of course, since there's at least one other current teacher interested. But if I do, that'd sure be nice. (And even if I don't, there may be additional full-time positions created over the next few months, which I'll apply for as well.)

Anyway, time now to see if I have more than the one student who showed up yesterday...
click here for a prize

Thanxkcdgiving [2008/12/07 (Sunday) 22:54 EST]
We had a ton of people over to the Hive (what my apartment is called, if you didn't know) for the Saturday after Thanksgiving. Some of the pictures I took can be found here.

Yesterday I went to the New England Aquarium with some friends, and will eventually be uploading the pictures and videos I took there. (Videos mostly being of penguins, since they're adorable. But also a cuttlefish whose skin was constantly changing colors slightly, which looked awesome.)
click here for a prize

Better Imagery of San Cristobal [2008/11/28 (Friday) 15:24 EST]
I discovered today that Google now has much better images of San Cristobal than it did before, so I went ahead and made a map including where I worked and stayed while I lived there. (Eventually I may put in some other interesting or important locations from my stay.)

Also, of course, happy Thanksgiving to everyone (belatedly) and Black Friday (on time). Hope you had/have a wonderful time. I didn't do much last night, but friends came over and we watched Futurama and ordered Indian food. Our big (as in, like, 30 people) thing is happening tomorrow, since a lot of people were with family yesterday.
2 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Sheltie Song [2008/11/16 (Sunday) 16:17 EST]
[info]stacebass's dog.


If You're Happy and You Know It Sheltie from Stacy H on Vimeo.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

Even Fox News gets it right sometimes. [2008/11/08 (Saturday) 07:55 EST]
Also, why I will never ever vote for Ralph Nader. Whether he's knowing and still completely unapologetic, or whether he really somehow doesn't get what's wrong with saying Obama might be an Uncle Tom, he has, as the interviewer says, basically argued himself into complete irrelevance now. (Though, to be honest, some of his "These two clearly different candidates are basically the same, so you should vote for me" rhetoric got really damn old years ago, when said about two so clearly different candidates...)

9 gullible individuals|click here for a prize

Results [2008/11/05 (Wednesday) 10:18 EST]
So I'm proud of the state where I live (for decriminalizing marijuana and not abolishing the income tax) and where I voted (for allowing medicinal marijuana and stem cell research), but can't say as the other ballot measure results are particularly nice. Well, some are, like allowing assisted suicide and CO's decision *not* to define life beginning at conception. (Seriously, wouldn't that require things like passports for fetuses traveling overseas and all sorts of other ridiculous implications, in addition to making abortion murder?) But a number of states, including (probably?) California, have again voted to ban gay marriage, and Arkansas has banned gay adoption now, too.

Good job, Arkansans, way to take a nice pro-life stance. All those not-aborted babies are totally going to have an easier time of it now that you decided certain combinations of people can't be parents.
1 gullible individual|click here for a prize

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]